From Team to True Squad: Building Synergy in Scrum

I’m excited to share my latest article, “From Team to True Squad: Building Synergy in Scrum,” recently published on Devm.io!

We often hear about the importance of teamwork when we talk about agile and Scrum in particular. But there’s a massive difference between a group of individuals that work together and a squad that truly clicks. Building a high-performing Scrum team is less about following rigid frameworks and more about nurturing relationships, creating trust and creating a shared vision & sense of purpose. What truly elevates a group of individuals into a high-performing squad is synergy—that magical cohesion where the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

Key Insights from the Article

🔹 Continuous Improvement: Agile squads thrive when retrospectives are used not just as a ritual but as a powerful tool for learning and growth. The key is to focus on actionable feedback, addressing both the wins and the pain points. Improvement isn’t a one-time event; it’s a mindset that fosters resilience and adaptability.

🔹 Alignment with Autonomy: Balancing squad goals with overarching organizational objectives can be tricky, but it’s essential. Alignment ensures that the team delivers value, while autonomy empowers them to decide how to deliver it, fueling innovation and ownership.

🔹 The Role of Trust: A true squad is built on a foundation of trust. When team members trust each other, they feel safe to share ideas, challenge norms, and admit mistakes—without fear of blame or judgment. This psychological safety is the bedrock of creativity, collaboration, and continuous improvement. Leaders must actively foster trust by encouraging open dialogue, leading by example, and celebrating team wins.

🔹 Fostering Synergy: Building synergy means creating an environment where collaboration isn’t just encouraged—it’s ingrained in the squad’s DNA. This involves clear communication, shared accountability, and a shared vision of success.

Why It Matters

Agile is more than a process; it’s a way of thinking. When squads embody these principles, they don’t just deliver—they innovate, inspire, and transform.

📖 Read the full article here: From Team to True Squad: Building Synergy in Scrum

I’d love to hear your thoughts:

  • How do you foster trust within your teams?
  • What strategies have helped your squads achieve true synergy?

Let’s discuss and share ideas!

#AgileLeadership #TeamSynergy #ScrumMastery #TrustInTeams #ContinuousImprovement #AgileSquads #LeadershipMatters #DevOps

Shipping Daily : From Sprints to Continuous Releases

DevOps Teams that achieve daily releases have mastered a unique set of skills and practices to ship software faster and more frequently, with higher confidence. This high frequency release model differs significantly from the traditional Scrum framework with 2-week sprints (or longer). 

I wrote about this recently in my article published at devm.io platform , where I discussed the daily routines, processes and tools that support these teams, while contrasting them with more familiar cadence of traditional scrum teams. For teams and organizations looking to move towards daily releases, I also covered the key adjustments required to turn this vision into reality.

The Daily Rhythm: Planning, Execution, and Monitoring

1. Planning

For teams delivering code daily, the rhythm of planning, execution and monitoring does not follow the two-week sprint cycle but happens continuously. Here is what this daily rhythm looks like:

  • Frequent Prioritization: Daily release teams prioritize their work each day, selecting high impact tasks that can be completed and shipped within a single day.
  • Dynamic Backlogs: Instead of working with a static sprint backlog which is derived from the mammoth product backlog, these teams operate with highly flexible backlogs – adding things to it every day. They are ready to pivot quickly in response to customer feedback or issues, urgent needs or new business opportunities.
  • Smaller Targeted Tasks: Work items are broken into small, manageable pieces – each designed to be completed within hours. User stories and tasks are refined to be achievable in less than a day, keeping workloads manageable and ensuring that work completed aligns with daily release goals.

2. Execution

Unlike Scrum teams that often release at the end of a sprint, daily release teams execute work with a focus on immediate delivery.

  • Incremental Work: Instead of waiting until the end of a sprint, developers push small, frequent changes every day. Every code change is designed to be testable and deployable at the end of the day.
  • Automated Testing: It is critical to daily releases. CI pipelines are designed to run tests on each code change, ensuring stability and reliability and readiness of production.
  • Seamless Deployment: CD pipelines are in place, so that the code – once tested – is deployed automatically to production. With daily releases, teams cannot afford to spend hours on deployment activity every single day – so it is imperative to automate it.

3. Monitoring

  • Automated Monitoring: Monitoring tools track deployment success, system performance, and error rates in real time. Tools like Datadog, New Relic, or Prometheus help track application performance, error rates and system health. These tools are crucial for catching issues early and preventing them from impacting users.
  • Daily Retrospective Feedback Loops: Instead of waiting until the end of a sprint, the team reviews their daily progress and identifies immediate improvements – leading to quick adjustments.

Read the full article here for details on :

Normal Scrum vs Daily Release : Key Differences

Practices to Support Daily Releases

Key Metrics to Track

When are Daily Releases Appropriate?

Benefits of Daily Releases

Defining Your Definition of Done

The success of your team and the release depends on everyone getting their individual parts done in time. But how do you define being “done”? What indicates a finished task and differentiates it from a half-baked one?

It is all about having a clear definition of done established and agreed upon within the team from the onset of the project. Check out my article published at https://blog.gurock.com/definition-of-done/ – Here I talk about some good ways to define your Definition-Of-Done

Brainstorm with your team

The person who is going to work on each task is obviously the best person to comment on how and when it will be closed. So, the first step would be to discuss and list the obvious things these people deem would need to be done in order to be able to say that their task is done. Sometimes, you may be surprised how different these “obvious” points may be for different team members.

For instance, Tester 1 may say that after executing tests on their user story, they also spend an hour doing exploratory testing before completing their testing tasks, while Tester 2 did not consider that as part of the task. They completed the test execution task once done with scripted tests and later, if time permitted, would perform some exploratory tests.

By doing this exercise you are baselining your expectations from each task, independent of its owners.

Consider quality goals

If you are seeking to come up with a definition of done, there is probably an area you are trying to improve and some quality goals you are trying to achieve, so consider them now. Think of what seem to be your team’s problem areas, or the source of their delays at the end. Now add a part of those quality goals in the relevant tasks.

For example, let’s say your builds seem to fail too often, and that leads to a lot of rework and retesting within the sprint. After some analysis, you found that the build failed because of developers checking in buggy code, mostly lacking integration tests.

Read More »