Technical debt is like the credit card debt of the software world – easy to accumulate but expensive to pay off if not managed. Technical debt occurs when shortcuts are taken during the development process, often to meet tight deadlines or push out new features quickly. With agile’s fast pace, it is easy to accumulate technical debt, justifying it as the need of the hour and need of the market. But just like credit card debt, the interest from technical debt compounds over time, making future changes harder, more expensive and riskier. The question many development teams face is how to convince the leadership to invest in resolving technical debt, even when everything seems to be working fine on the surface.

I recently wrote this article for the devm.io platform where I explore effective strategies for communicating the hidden costs of technical debt, demonstrating its impact on innovation, and making a compelling case for prioritizing it – even if it means temporarily slowing down feature delivery. By understanding and articulating the true risks of technical debt, you can help your team invest in long term health and scalability of your product.

The Hidden Costs of Technical Debt

Many teams struggle with increasing time to production, decreasing velocity sprint-after-sprint and it might begin to seem like the team’s productivity is decreasing over time. The most dangerous aspect of technical debt is its impact on your team’s ability to innovate and scale. At first glance, technical debt may not seem like a pressing issue – since the software is running smoothly and features are being delivered. The problem is that technical debt accumulates gradually and its effects remain hidden until they reach a tipping point.

Every shortcut taken, like skipping tests, avoiding refactoring, hardcoding solutions or neglecting peer reviews – creates complexity in your codebase. As this complexity builds up, it slows down your development process, increases the likelihood of issues, makes future enhancements more difficult and time consuming.

Not only this, there may be instances when these skipped actions are actually mandatorily needed for certain regulations, contracts or standards that we adhere to. This means the team would end up having to do them later, spending more time and causing delays in our project completion.

To read the complete article, visit the devm.io platform

<My article published at devm.io platform: https://devm.io/agile/technical-debt-costs-strategies>